[Build Great Backlinks] TITLE

Build Great Backlinks has posted a new item, 'Getting Authorship to Work: A
Moz.com Case Study'

Posted by Ruth_Burr
Having author markup working on your site is importantâespecially if,
like Moz, you're producing new blog content daily. Not only does having an
author picture snippet in the SERPs help increase clickthrough, it also builds
trust with users when they see an author they already know and respect has
written a piece of content. Author markup may also help sites get other special
results such as the in-depth article result. All in all, Google seems to be
doing a lot to encourage blog owners and writers alike to implement authorship
markup on their sites.
So why is it so $@%#! hard to get working properly?
Behold the epic saga of trying to get authorship working on Moz.com. It's been
almost two years, and we've finally gotten it working (mostly) correctly. I
wanted to share our journey with you in the hopes that it will take you less
time to figure out what's going on with your own site.

Part I: In which we have a brief hiccup followed by success

When I started at Moz back in 2012 (in the before times; the long long ago;
the SEOmoz), authorship wasn't working properly on Moz.com becauseâ
wellâ it hadn't been implemented properly. In the "Join the Moz Community"
buttons you see to the right of each blog post, the link to our Google+ page was
overriding author markup on individual posts. This meant that Google thought
that the Moz page was the author of each posts. We were getting a nice little
author snippet with Roger's picture, but individual authors were out of luck.
A friendly Moz community member pointed this out right after I started, and we
were able to get it fixed up pretty quickly. The result: SUCCESS!





We started seeing correct authorship snippets almost right away. And I was all
like:




But then, something changed.

Part II: In which everything is terrible

After several months of authorship appearing for content on Moz.com with no
problems, our authorship snippets disappeared. Poof! Suddenly we couldn't find a
single example of the snippet appearing for Moz content.




The worst part was that Google's Structured Data Validator tool claimed that
our author markup was working just fine:





What often happens in situations like this is that Google changes the criteria
for a snippet to appear, but doesn't update the validator tool until much later.
In this case, what I suspect happened is that Google got stricter about how
markup could be implemented and still work, probably due to too many false
positives. Our markup wasn't perfect, but it was close enough for Google to
connect the dotsâuntil they decided not to anymore.
Unfortunately, this also meant we couldn't rely on the validator tool to tell
us whether or not we'd fixed the problem. With no more information than "it
stopped working for some reason," I set out to troubleshoot everything I could
think of.

Part III: In which things are tried

We were using the 2-link method for authorship markup, in which we link from
the author's byline to his or her Moz profile with "rel=author" and then from
the author's profile page to their Google+ page with "rel=me." Like I said, this
was working fine until it wasn't anymore.
Here are the things we tested to try to get authorship working again:Nofollow
links from social sharing buttons to Google+. Remembering our earlier fiasco, we
tried nofollowing links to Google+ from our social sharing buttons. I remember
thinking "if this is the problem, that's really stupid" but it wasn't.Result: No
change.Linking directly from author byline to Google+ profile. Historically on
the Moz blog, the post author's byline links to his or her profile page in our
community section. Concerned that this made for too many links for Google to
parse, we tested linking directly to authors' Google+ profiles from their
bylines.Result: No change. Also, you guys HATED it. Turns out that the ability
to click through from an author's byline to read more posts by that author is a
feature our readers love.Adding nicknames in Google+. Many of our authors don't
blog under their real names. For example, Dr. Pete's first name isn't really
Doctor. To see if the nickname thing was throwing Google off, we got a few of
our authors to add their nicknames in Google+.Result: No change.Start using
authors' real names. In your Moz community profile settings, you have the option
to tell us whether or not you're comfortable with us displaying your real first
and last name, as opposed to your username. Because not everyone chose this
option, our default was to show everyone's usernames. Since Google+ is such a
stickler for people using their real names and faces, we updated our settings so
that users' first and last names were their author bylines instead of their
usernames. Result: No change, butâLink to Google+ with real names. Feeling
sure we were onto something with the whole "real names" thing, we tried
switching the anchor text on profile page links to Google+ profiles. Now,
instead of saying e.g. "randfish on Google+," links to Google+ from Moz profile
pages would say "Rand Fishkin on Google+."Result: Successâ?
Our "use real names" initiative got authorship snippets appearing in the SERPs
again: hooray! However, in many cases they were the WRONG results:




This is a post by Rand.




This is a picture of Erica.

Part IV: In which all (OK, most) is revealed

It turns out that Google is currently very sensitive to byline information.
Any instance of the word "by" followed by someone's name â especially if
that person also has authorship set up on the site as well. On the Moz blog, any
comment that had been edited after posting had a notice that said "Edited by
(user) on (date)." That extra instance of "by" followed by a name was messing
Google UP. We changed the wording on edited comments, and authorship was fixed!
Mostly!
We are actually still seeing this problem crop up from time to time in posts
where we say "by (person's name)" in the body of the blog post, and then that
person comments on the post. It's not a super common occurrence, but it does
happen, especially since people tend to comment on posts in which they're
mentioned. Beyond removing the instance of "by" and changing the post wording, I
haven't figured out a systemic fix for that yet. Further bulletins as events
unfold!

TL;DR

In order to get authorship working, here are some things to keep in mind:

You can't always trust the validator tool. Check your SERPs (in an incognito
window or with personalization turned off) to be sure.
Google takes any instance of "by (person's name)" seriously, so if you're
getting the wrong author snippet, check for that first.
Adding nicknames in Google+ is much less effective than using your real name.
Wherever possible, use real first and last names to get author snippets.
For more on troubleshooting authorship, read Mark Traphagen's post from last
year (notice I didn't say "this post byâ" well, you get the idea).
Sign up for The Moz Top 10, a semimonthly mailer updating you on the top ten
hottest pieces of SEO news, tips, and rad links uncovered by the Moz team. Think
of it as your exclusive digest of stuff you don't have time to hunt down but
want to read!



You may view the latest post at
http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/seomoz/~3/XkYbgYjo408/getting-authorship-to-work

You received this e-mail because you asked to be notified when new updates are
posted.
Best regards,
Build Great Backlinks
peter.clarke@designed-for-success.com